Re: Enterprise using WO

At 3:38 PM -0300 5/21/05, Alejandro M. Ramallo wrote:
>Today, after 3 years of development we are convinced that WOF is 
>superior than Tapestry in terms of productivity and reuse (we came 
>out with our own framework as you might suspect). In terms of what 
>you can produce with each tool I am confident that they are both 
>equally effective.

I'm confused.

You're convinced that WO is superior than Tapestry in terms of 
productivity and reuse, but in terms of what you can produce with 
each too you're confident they are both equally effective?

That doesn't make sense to me.

:)

I would think if each are equally effective, productivity would be 
right in there.

Oh well.

I've got a whole bunch of WO developers doing Tapestry (with a couple 
experienced in it)... so we'll find out.

mark

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Mark F. Murphy, Director Software Development   <mailto:[email protected]>
  Tyrell Software Corp                            <http://www.tyrell.com>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------