Re: Ruby on Rails?

I've switched pretty much all of our development of Web apps to RoR.

It has nothing that compares to D2W, so if you're using that, don't  
even bother looking.

If you're using EOF and WOF to build Web-apps, it is worth a look for  
sure. My team is very productive with RoR. It feels less 'heavy' than  
WO in terms of all the things I have to get going to get an app running.

One nice thing - being Open Source - I know where the product is  
going, a stark contrast to WO. Also, being free of EOModeler and  
WOBuilder is not making me sad.

Not to say I don't like WO. I do and still have several apps using it  
that I maintain.

Cheers.

On Oct 26, 2005, at 10:25 PM, Bruce Fancher wrote:

>
> So, anyone on the list look at this?  It seems very similar to  
> WebObjects
> and it's becoming extremely buzzword-compliant, which WebObjects  
> never was,
> and unfortunately, never will be.  Especially curious about  
> impressions from
> people who've used both WOF and Rails.
>
> Bruce
>
> _______________________________________________
> WebObjects-talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-talk