Re: Apple, Microsoft, Java and the Web?
Ashley Aitken <[email protected]> Sun, 13 Aug 2006 10:53:17 +0800
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.macosx.general,gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Ok, thanks everyone for their posts. I agree Apple is (mostly) a hardware company and Microsoft (mostly) a software/OS company. I agree that Apple focuses mostly on the consumer whereas Microsoft includes business. However, both Java and the Web make the hardware (whether you are using a PC or a Mac) and the OS (whether you are paying for Windows or not) mostly irrelevant. Is that just something these companies have to live with now? Sure there will always be native desktop applications but with Web apps becoming more dynamic (see Google, Echo) and Java server apps (and some desktop apps) being cross platform I don't think the brand of hardware or OS will matter that much to the average user or application server. Media apps, like the iLife apps and Media-Centres, seem to be their only remaining value-add for the average user (who doesn't use Photoshop ;-) and I guess productivity applications for business and the prosumer. I would suggest that animation in the GUI and applications are mostly a distraction but add little real value to their platform. I guess what I am suggesting now is that because of the Web and Java these companies are now selling "different products." The home PC that used to focus on basic productivity and Internet, now really has to be a "Media PC." And I can't see Apple doing well in business as Microsoft slowly backs away from Mac support (no VBA in future Mac releases). Cheers, Ashley.