Re: Open source WO (was: Apple, Microsoft, Java and the Web?)
Georg Tuparev <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:11:45 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
If I was a large Bank, and most of my code is COBOL written in the 70- ies, I would love the second option. No kidding! g On Aug 24, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Bruce Fancher wrote: > 1) "I'm going to build your project using this open source web > framework > called Wicket (for example). It's new and not that many people are > using it > yet, but here's the web site and an article about it from JavaWorld." > > 2) "I'm going to build your project using this product from Apple > called > WebObjects. The developer tools are deprecated and only run well > on a Mac > anyway, and there hasn't been a new major release in about five > years, but > fortunately if I ever need to extend it I can just weave new > bytecodes in > using AspectJ." > > Which one do you think is going be more successful in a big company IT > department? > > Bruce Georg Tuparev Tuparev Technologies Klipper 13 1186 VR Amstelveen The Netherlands Mobile: +31-6-55798196