Re: Open source WO (was: Apple, Microsoft, Java and the Web?)

Georg Tuparev <[email protected]> Thu, 24 Aug 2006 17:11:45 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
If I was a large Bank, and most of my code is COBOL written in the 70- 
ies, I would love the second option. No kidding!

g

On Aug 24, 2006, at 2:40 PM, Bruce Fancher wrote:

> 1) "I'm going to build your project using this open source web  
> framework
> called Wicket (for example).  It's new and not that many people are  
> using it
> yet, but here's the web site and an article about it from JavaWorld."
>
> 2) "I'm going to build your project using this product from Apple  
> called
> WebObjects.  The developer tools are deprecated and only run well  
> on a Mac
> anyway, and there hasn't been a new major release in about five  
> years, but
> fortunately if I ever need to extend it I can just weave new  
> bytecodes in
> using AspectJ."
>
> Which one do you think is going be more successful in a big company IT
> department?
>
> Bruce

Georg Tuparev
Tuparev Technologies
Klipper 13
1186 VR Amstelveen
The Netherlands
Mobile: +31-6-55798196