Re: Open source WO - offer
Andrus Adamchik <[email protected]> Mon, 4 Sep 2006 10:23:18 +0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sep 4, 2006, at 10:12 AM, Andrus Adamchik wrote: > The differences are in details. Here is a few that I can think of > right away (aside from the license): > > * More databases are supported by Cayenne. > * Database type selection is automatic (no need to edit > configuration when deploying the same app to a different db). > * Better raw SQL queries: scriptable; support for configuration of > multiple DB dialects in the same query. > * "Local JNDI" mode that allows to work with JNDI model in the > absence of a container. Forgot a few more things: * Cayenne stack supports running custom query classes, so you can extend standard query behavior, or implement custom database "commands". * Cross-VM cache synchronization is built in. * Caching query lists (EOF only offers caching individual objects) * Paginated queries (I believe this is available via Wonder?) * (3.0 only) Pluggable cache implementation. So you can have a single external managed cache, such as OSCache, used for many things, ORM being only one of them. This is great for CMS-like apps. Andrus