Re: WO vs. .Net 3.5 LINQ
Miguel Arroz <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Dec 2007 22:25:18 +0000
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
--===============0550680927== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-8--802612803; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" --Apple-Mail-8--802612803 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Hi! On 2007/12/01, at 22:12, Mike Schrag wrote: >> In MS's defense, LINQ is more abstract than that, and a LITTLE bit >> interesting ... For instance, you can construct a LINQ query >> against an XML document (so it effectively behaves like XPath, but >> in a unified query language). Humm.... that seems... Core Data? :) Yours Miguel Arroz Miguel Arroz http://www.terminalapp.net http://www.ipragma.com --Apple-Mail-8--802612803-- --===============0550680927== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ WebObjects-talk mailing list [email protected] http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-talk --===============0550680927==--