Re: WO vs. .Net 3.5 LINQ

Miguel Arroz <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Dec 2007 22:25:18 +0000
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general
Message-ID <[email protected]>
--===============0550680927==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=sha1; boundary=Apple-Mail-8--802612803;
	protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"


--Apple-Mail-8--802612803
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=US-ASCII;
	delsp=yes;
	format=flowed

Hi!

On 2007/12/01, at 22:12, Mike Schrag wrote:

>> In MS's defense, LINQ is more abstract than that, and a LITTLE bit  
>> interesting ... For instance, you can construct a LINQ query  
>> against an XML document (so it effectively behaves like XPath, but  
>> in a unified query language).


   Humm.... that seems... Core Data? :)

   Yours

Miguel Arroz

Miguel Arroz
http://www.terminalapp.net
http://www.ipragma.com




--Apple-Mail-8--802612803--

--===============0550680927==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
WebObjects-talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/webobjects-talk

--===============0550680927==--