Re: State of Windows deployment in 2009?
Mike Schrag <[email protected]> Tue, 24 Nov 2009 15:21:18 -0500
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.webobjects.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
I was just in the midst of typing the same thing. Almost all of our new = deployments will be on Linux in a VM infrastructure. And I don't need = Apple to provide me anything. I can't really think of a WO enhancement = that can't be done by a 3rd party. IMO, for the past 5 years, the = community has brought far more interesting enhancements than Apple has. = What are you expecting Apple to provide to you that Wonder doesn't = provide to you RIGHT NOW, in an open development process. ms On Nov 24, 2009, at 3:04 PM, Anjo Krank wrote: > Jesus. Apple will do what they want. Nothing you, I or anybody else = says or does will make much of a difference. Nor should we really care, = it's not like they did something useful in the last 5 years or so. >=20 > You sound like they were some sort of rain god. "Let's show we are = loyal, or else HE might smite us like the flies we are!" >=20 > Cheers, Anjo >=20 >=20 >=20 > Am 24.11.2009 um 20:36 schrieb Gaastra Dennis - WO Lists: >=20 >> If we want Apple to release new WebObjects versions, beyond 5.4.3, = to the community, the worst thing we can do is talking about Windows and = Linux. We should be very clear about this: if we expect Apple to do = anything for us in the regard, we should be loyal to Apple by only = developing and deploying on Apple equipment. Otherwise, I am afraid that = 5.4.3 will be the last version we will ever see... >>=20 >> With Kind Regards, >>=20 >> Dennis Gaastra,=20 >> Chief Technology Officer, >> WEBAPPZ Systems, Inc. >>=20 >>=20 >> This message contains confidential information and is intended only = for the individual named. If you are not the named addressee you should = not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the = sender immediately by e-mail if you have received this e-mail by mistake = and delete this e-mail from your system. E-mail transmission cannot be = guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be = intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or = contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any = errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a = result of e-mail transmission. If verification is required please = request a hard-copy version. WEBAPPZ Systems, Inc., 726 - 1489 Marine = Drive, West Vancouver, BC, CANADA V7T 1B8, www.webappz.com >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >> On 2009-11-24, at 10:19 AM, Kieran Kelleher wrote: >>=20 >>> 1) The customer sometimes is willing to compromise and give you a = Linux box ... deployment on Linux is as easy as Mac more-or-less. So, if = they won't let you use Mac, ask if you can use Linux.... and setup = CentOS or RHEL on it. >>>=20 >>> 2) Project Wonder has source for Adaptors. I see IIS adaptor source = in there. No idea how good it is: >>>=20 >>> /Wonder/Utilities/Adaptors/IIS/ >>>=20 >>> HTH, Kieran >>>=20 >>> On Nov 24, 2009, at 12:36 PM, Ralph Scheuer wrote: >>>=20 >>>> Hello everybody, >>>>=20 >>>> due to the fact that some of our customers use Windows servers, I = would be interested how others deploy their WO apps on Windows these = days... >>>>=20 >>>> The wiki only refers to Apache when it comes to WO 5.4 on Windows = and does not mention IIS... >>>>=20 >>>> However, some customers need specific IIS features like = Single-Sign-On via ActiveDirectory or do not want another web server for = political reasons. >>>>=20 >>>> How do you deal with that? >>>>=20 >>>> Is it still possible to use the old 5.2 adaptors (CGI or ISAPI) = with modern IIS versions and WO 5.4? How about 64-bit-ness? >>>>=20 >>>> Would it be possible to set up WO 5.2 and just replace all the = frameworks with the 5.4 equivalents so that at least the CGI adaptor = (WebObjects.exe) from the old version works? >>>>=20 >>>> Has Apple ever released the source of the Windows adaptors so that = they could be recompiled for 64-bit IIS? >>>>=20 >>>> Thanks for your input. >>>>=20 >>>> Ralph >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >>>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>>> = http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/kieran_lists%40mac.c= om >>>>=20 >>>> This email sent to [email protected] >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >>> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >>> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >>> = http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/webobjects_lists%40w= ebappz.com >>>=20 >>> This email sent to [email protected] >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. >> Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) >> Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: >> = http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/anjo%40krank.net >>=20 >> This email sent to [email protected] >=20 > _______________________________________________ > Do not post admin requests to the list. They will be ignored. > Webobjects-dev mailing list ([email protected]) > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > = http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/webobjects-dev/mschrag%40mdimension= .com >=20 > This email sent to [email protected]