Re: Integer overflows in parse_content_range() and gethttp()
Tim Rühsen <[email protected]> Sun, 3 Mar 2024 19:52:51 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.wget.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thanks vulnerabilityspotter,
are there any insights why this specific integer overflow is a
vulnerability? ("potential" is not enough)
TL;DR for the audience:
An AI generated vulnerability report. I mostly agree with what has been
written for curl at https://github.com/curl/curl/issues/12983
But I am not saying that the code is good code, it can definitely be
improved. And also, I like the approach of automated searching for
defects in software, be it an AI tool or whatever. Keep on improving!
In case you want to report more findings, please do not use the ML, as
all posts here are public. Either report to Savannah or to Gitlab in
"private" mode.
Regards, Tim
On 2/24/24 23:38, vulnerabilityspotter--- via Primary discussion list
for GNU Wget wrote:
> Security Vulnerability Report
>
> File: src/http.c
>
> Functions: parse_content_range() and gethttp()
>
> Vulnerability Type: Integer Overflow
>
> Location: Lines 936, 942, 955 and 3739
>
> Severity: High
>
> Description:
>
> In the parse_content_range() function, at lines 936, 942, 955, there exists a vulnerability related to an integer overflow. The vulnerability arises from the calculation of the variable num, which is assigned the value of
>
> num = 10 * num + (*hdr - '0');
>
> Both the multiplication and addition can lead to an integer overflow, and lead to unexpected behavior, due to the lack of validation.
>
> Furthermore similarly to [curl/curl#12983](https://github.com/curl/curl/issues/12983), at line 3739 of function gethttp(), the calculation of the contlen variable can also overflow:
>
> contlen = last_byte_pos - first_byte_pos + 1;
>
> Exploitation Scenario:
>
> An attacker may craft a malicious request with carefully chosen values in the Content-Range header, triggering an integer overflow during the calculation of num and contlen. This could potentially lead to various security issues, such as memory corruption, buffer overflows, or unexpected behavior, depending on how the num and contlen variables is subsequently used.
>
> Impact:
>
> The impact of this vulnerability could be severe, potentially leading to:
>
> Memory Corruption: If the calculated num and contlen value are used to allocate memory or perform operations such as copying data, an integer overflow could result in memory corruption, leading to crashes or arbitrary code execution.
>
> Security Bypass: In scenarios where num and contlen value are used to enforce boundaries or permissions, an attacker may exploit the integer overflow to bypass security checks or gain unauthorized access to sensitive resources.
>
> Denial of Service (DoS): A carefully crafted request exploiting the integer overflow could cause the application to enter an unexpected state or consume excessive resources, leading to a denial of service condition.
>
> Recommendations:
>
> Bounds Checking: Implement proper bounds checking to ensure that the values of num and contlen are within acceptable ranges before performing calculations.
>
> Safe Arithmetic Operations: Consider using safer arithmetic operations or alternative calculation methods to prevent integer overflows, especially when dealing with potentially large or close-to-boundary values.
>
> Input Validation: Validate input parameters to ensure they adhere to expected ranges and constraints before performing calculations.
>
> Error Handling: Implement robust error handling mechanisms to gracefully handle scenarios where input parameters result in unexpected or invalid calculations.
>
> Severity Justification:
>
> The presence of an integer overflow vulnerability at lines 936, 942, 955 and 3739 poses a high risk to the security and stability of the application. Exploitation of this vulnerability could lead to severe consequences, including memory corruption, security bypass, or denial of service conditions.
>
> Affected Versions:
>
> This vulnerability affects all versions of the application that include the vulnerable parse_content_range() and gethttp() functions.
>
> References:
>
> OWASP Integer Overflow
> CWE-190: Integer Overflow or Wraparound
> CERT Secure Coding - INT32-C
>
> Conclusion:
>
> The presence of an integer overflow vulnerability at lines 936, 942, 955 in the parse_content_range() function and line 3739 of gethttp() poses a high risk to the security and stability of the application. It is imperative to address this vulnerability promptly by implementing appropriate bounds checking and error handling mechanisms to prevent potential exploitation and associated security risks.
>
> Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/) secure email.
OpenPGP_signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 840 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- wsF5BAABCAAjFiEEHLJ9vJhhSy1YQWRtCDAttqJnBCgFAmXkxwMFAwAAAAAACgkQCDAttqJnBChd Jg/+Ic0i3UNpUlBpkDmHX+emzAPljxJFzZ9OurhYbzPYaV3eZEjxCtemDGMtMaEIq3U4I3Pi95GB J4koh/y8GPjM++Fm6UN0gb1L3WBO3oQWYE5QQGChDWnzukYYGnLZps/ZT4RMRnOTwV3MgcEOpsVn PDgnfhO09ES85qaDRS6OtEFHaG9avNMa8vg5j0V/mqiBqxrOF5hzeSE7tBsYdtOdbRnzuiDei7ex slix912ajLgdgQNG2gin16a3QEPLbGTn8y5uiq5J9U7n7/t8Lhv34geJcOXRICMuI6uLnSjXBFTE jj+u4qf11gu8FYJUbPnPbjNQqurJgDSKcdTPhm2RZqZ3qu/6dWSj142Xgk99QHMmdL3pF6w8WezS 8lwWlqa3ihLjVMo0xgNNq2yweqKvF+UhiiGe//2MBQ1AkcZgfWrbmaWR9aXAM8OJxDJPJ2uw7aGI PSXSv5sWjn/aTX6wflvnRfFog40yzutC6hJB7a3eqd5omKzjMV+TNpVagZQTlOma3Hwj9eHbUZBu ZRKJMZ/LxuuJs7dIfT5yIKhNHaoSZkby035GYzYyF6hK+860gchJyxG5FExUhipYDm8SWGWq7wcJ EDdeRJjbjqalg3BCeKRtsWYNJ9flGu0kJKgLmPMgMp393i5HEhgSZYcSrDNKD4iXg6bAsDPzmxf2 4BQ= =oM3W -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----