Re: Wget 1 is not preserving server-side modification times via FTP
Thomas Orgis <[email protected]> Sat, 1 Jun 2024 20:33:49 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.wget.general |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20240601203349.770849cc@plasteblaster> |
Hi Tim, Am Sat, 1 Jun 2024 18:57:00 +0200 schrieb Tim Rühsen <[email protected]>: > Wget sets the remote time when using the -N / --timestamping option. Hm, that is related to comparing local and remote timestamps for deciding to re-download a file or not (I read in the man page). How is that related to wget not storing the timestmap from FTP, while it does so from HTTP, without any option? Isn't -N just a follow-up starting from correct local timestamps? > > Is a fix in wget 1.x something to be considered at this point in time? > > Yes, if we find a volunteer to make up a patch. OK. I may put that on the list of things to do if I don't have anything to do … but seriously: This should be something easy, as wget can already get and parse the date from FTP … or might this incur an additional command exchange for listing the file instead of just getting it, as opposed to HTTP where Last-Modified is always sent in the response? > > FTP support seems to be dropped altogether from Wget 2 (correct?) > > Not dropped, but it is not implemented. The number of FTP users is > relatively small and there are plenty of FTP clients (e.g. wget for > recursive mode). Also, FTP seems to be dying, so why implement another > FTP client at all!? This is because wget and curl (and others that I'm not that familiar with) abstract that detail away for me. I don't want to talk HTTP or FTP … I don't even want to start separate code paths for differing URLs (having to parse URL schemes, then). I got scripts that download resources from URLs. If that URL is for HTTP (v1/2/3) or FTP, or any other option that happens to work, is something that I don't want to deal with. As long as there is a single FTP server out there (or I might run a local one, for reasons unknown;-) and wget 1 has the functionality, it is odd not to implement it in the successor. I understand that people don't want to deal with the protocol … that is why we use time-tested tools that implemented it ages ago;-) This is especially important since Firefox dropped support for FTP, one sign of the slow death of the protocol … with the browser refusing to browse/download FTP resources, this is one use-case to pull out the command-line tool even if one is using the interactive browser normally. So far I switched to curl in the downloader script at hand … but had a bit of a learning curve that curl needs extra options for wgets standard behaviour of exiting with an error if server gives a negative response (like 403). Alrighty then, Thomas -- GPG public key 60D5CAFE: https://thomas.orgis.org/public_key Fingerprint: D021 FF8E CF4B E097 19D6 1A27 231C 4CBC 60D5 CAFE And despite all of you, I'm still doing it. Yes, I do write Perl code.
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 833 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE0CH/js9L4JcZ1honIxxMvGDVyv4FAmZbaY0ACgkQIxxMvGDV yv4Y4g/8DSczIvTsKGp+9bbL3X0EhCgBA6T0g/v2sLz52ZYJoYPDeCQmoO2PLSfk OsMWtPYW4CPHLYUf3e7JI4ZCIiTCSYQ7d0veJhP5XMR7lfht6SONQfL1/K6h4h5B 5zik0xWjeO4rEyq1pZIaI8Yb76B4Et954OgA6zEnBXbiMR+ULvvQqmQwCzrP2DN1 dobLFHGpvWlwVAJuo68H71pV2fepJfia4uxqd/F2QV8MwZRAPqL0m2D2xOh5W192 35Z8uZ5RrDqScIYO3JgAhOnRZsaFsJXqgheaHhDNbPKVeNxDHpC+uMqnn6x7ccgZ 5mTA8mytr/QI3uJgxB/FHBMUvk5hVjFB64IBXjf0gd7JShV66DGmaHybZ3DqvfBv L0YVP4y61KmLB4Y8DP7vvtxO3JuV9CZoJ7Bv7DG8bAzRQtckdZMedgR3ouQuptyU u4nkc8Ei03sHyXHFZy9tFO5n+0snk+d9oOMCTsb9T2RyK++xH3PSpBTYz1p1wLtD OV+Hk3i2gTalipnphQrVEAj41ay5yY2UaWo7Y8JY/7AT/8GC4tsrOj+VSJRTrTfS R81QWaeNphN0J9v4a+nrXtHHZt9XK1eYS9ZmesbgAWA7myIqZhAoVBrHg5o6jjbc pNOs4tMzR4fLSQGjn9S8IggsIxxKG3tXgv/OOOjgxB3uIN6UnMo= =2Iiv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----