Re: New zlib patch (supports gzip encoding)
Mark Atkinson <[email protected]> Fri, 29 Apr 2005 08:39:54 -0700 (PDT)
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.wget.patches |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20050429082951.P18642@localhost> |
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005, Hrvoje Niksic wrote: > Mark Atkinson <[email protected]> writes: > Thanks for sharing this. The problem is that it doesn't decompress > the data transparently, which is really a must, both for performance > and probably for handling of -c and restarted downloads. I planned to > add such support for 1.11. yes, I note this fact in my comments. Luckily files aren't scanned for anchors in-line, so -r still works with this patch. >> According to the zlib documentation it supports large files (4G), > Does it refer to files larger than 4G or to files in the 2G-4G range? That should have been ( > 4G ) http://www.gzip.org/zlib/zlib_faq.html#faq32 >> It adds --compress, or -z options to command line to request >> 'Accept-Encoding: gzip'. > > If we were to add such support, shouldn't that be the default? It could be, so you would rather have --no-compress, similar to --no-keepalives? > Note that you needn't add -R for Solaris; Wget is using libtool, which > adds -R automatically. Noted, I'll remove it. >> +#ifdef HAVE_ZLIB >> +# include "zlib.h" >> +#endif > > Shouldn't this be <zlib.h>? If you use --with-zlib=[DIR], you'd want this to be quote enclosed since it doesn't occur in the preprocessor/compilers built in search path. Thanks for the comments! -- Mark Atkinson (!wired)?(coffee++):(wired);