Re: Re: reStructuredText support

Alexander Schremmer wrote:
> On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 00:01:24 -0700, Matthew Gilbert wrote:
> 
> 
>>I recently submitted a new rst.py to sourceforge. Its a drop in 
>>replacement for the existing rst.py. It adds much better support for 
>>reStructuredText than what currently ships with MoinMoin. I also 
>>submitted a similar patch in September, and frankly this one is much 
>>better. I was hoping at least to get some feedback as to what I can 
>>improve to get this considered to be accepted. I have tested this quite 
>>a bit and have a few users who have tested it without issue. I would 
>>greatly appreciate anyone who would be willing to try it or who would be 
>>willing to provide feedback.
> 
> 
> I think that we should include it in the main distribution. The only
> drawback is that it does not use the formatter (at least I guess so).

You are correct, for many things it does not use the formatter. However, 
  I've tried to use it whenever possible. Right now those cases are 
limited to things such as emphasis, code, strong, bullet_list, etc. 
Thanks! _matt


-------------------------------------------------------
The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt