Re: Re: MoinI18n/pt and MoinI18n/pt-br

Leonardo Gregianin <[email protected]> Tue, 03 May 2005 16:18:22 -0300
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.wiki.moin.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Eduardo, I also am saying that the situation of the MoinMoin is 
different, and support the difference. What thinks of move of pt.po for 
pt_PT.po and clear? Then, someone that really speak pt_PT can translate 
the pt_PT, and the pt_BR stayed as is?

Best regards,
Leonardo Gregianin.


Eduardo Luis Isatto escreveu:

>Hi,
>
>I respect and partially agree with Leonardo. In the specific case of pt_PT and pt_BR there is also an agreement between governments to integrate both languages in the long term. However, it is the _ideal_ situation. In my specific situation, I am dealing with undergraduate students and need to be understood. As the say in Total Quality Management, we need to hear our customers. :)
>
>BTW, is much more difficult to Wikipedia to handle different languages than in MoinMoin. Also, Wikipedia has an important role to play in this process of language integration. I don't think the same happens with MoinMoin.
>
>Regards,
>
>Eduardo Isatto
>  
>


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games.
Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4
opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to
win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20