Re: Re: MoinI18n/pt and MoinI18n/pt-br
Leonardo Gregianin <[email protected]> Tue, 03 May 2005 16:18:22 -0300
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.wiki.moin.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eduardo, I also am saying that the situation of the MoinMoin is different, and support the difference. What thinks of move of pt.po for pt_PT.po and clear? Then, someone that really speak pt_PT can translate the pt_PT, and the pt_BR stayed as is? Best regards, Leonardo Gregianin. Eduardo Luis Isatto escreveu: >Hi, > >I respect and partially agree with Leonardo. In the specific case of pt_PT and pt_BR there is also an agreement between governments to integrate both languages in the long term. However, it is the _ideal_ situation. In my specific situation, I am dealing with undergraduate students and need to be understood. As the say in Total Quality Management, we need to hear our customers. :) > >BTW, is much more difficult to Wikipedia to handle different languages than in MoinMoin. Also, Wikipedia has an important role to play in this process of language integration. I don't think the same happens with MoinMoin. > >Regards, > >Eduardo Isatto > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: NEC IT Guy Games. Get your fingers limbered up and give it your best shot. 4 great events, 4 opportunities to win big! Highest score wins.NEC IT Guy Games. Play to win an NEC 61 plasma display. Visit http://www.necitguy.com/?r=20