Re: WML is not dead, is it? - A motivation email

"Märt Laak" <[email protected]> Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:51:50 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.wml
Message-ID <4238645F.3611.B1792D8@localhost>
I'm also very happy that something like WML exists. I'm using it in 
everydeay work yearly for different webs. So please do not drop this 
good project just like that.

What I miss is working compatibility with cygwin, so one could use 
WML also under Windows. I do not have Linux/Unix in hand every place 
where I'd like to use WML.

Regards,
Märt.

On 15 Mar 2005 at 14:39, Martin Feuersänger wrote:

> Hi List,
> 
> I use WML since some time now to twiddle on my private site from time
> to time and I really like it, especially it's flexibility.
> 
> However, since I use WML it's representation to the (internet) world
> is very very poor.
> 
> I don't complain about this mailinglist. Even though traffic is very
> low, the quality of the occasional messages is good, you can see that
> there are people who are really using WML, even at work. Denis Barbier
> seems to be still working on the code base, even though there hasn't
> been a release for a long time. Also responses are quick.
> 
> But when you are on the mailing list you are allready "into it". But
> what do people do who hear the first time about WML?
> 
> 1) They google.
>  - Asking google about WML doesn't help very much. There is the
> unfortunate collision with Wireless Markup Language. But otherwise you
> shouldn't expect much from a three letter word search.
>  - Asking google about "Website Meta Language" is good. You get 12.800
> references and on top is thewml.org
> 
> 2) They go to the top site.
>  - And this is where trouble starts. Sometimes (like right now) the
>  site
> is unreachable. And if you can reach it, a lot of important features
> are broken. A couple of months ago Shlomi Fish announced a brushup of
> the site but except for a 'Against epatents' button there is  not a
> lot of new stuff.
> 
> Don't get me wrong here. I'm not blaming anybody. I just want to state
> that for what WML can do, it is totaly 'underadvertised'.
> 
> Here is a list of my  top three whishes for the website:
> 
> - a searchable archive of the mailinglist
> - online documentation. wmd is fine for me, but if you are just a
> potential user, you want to have a look at the documentation before
> installing the software - examples, examples, examples. One thing is a
> good documentation, but it's nothing without examples. Code for whole
> sites is fine but what I would like most is a collection of code
> snippets that solve specific problems. What I'm thinking about is a
> kind of 'plugin collection'. I'd really like to share some of my
> stuff, maybe it's helpfull for others and I'd really like to dig thru
> other solutions.
> 
> Ok, these are my thoughts, what do you think?
> 
>   Martin
> 
> _____________________________________________________________________
> Website META Language (WML)                         http://thewml.org
> User Support Mailing List                        [email protected]
> Automated List Manager                            [email protected]


_____________________________________________________________________
Website META Language (WML)                         http://thewml.org
User Support Mailing List                        [email protected]
Automated List Manager                            [email protected]