Re: WML is not dead, is it? - A motivation email
"Märt Laak" <[email protected]> Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:51:50 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.wml |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4238645F.3611.B1792D8@localhost> |
I'm also very happy that something like WML exists. I'm using it in everydeay work yearly for different webs. So please do not drop this good project just like that. What I miss is working compatibility with cygwin, so one could use WML also under Windows. I do not have Linux/Unix in hand every place where I'd like to use WML. Regards, Märt. On 15 Mar 2005 at 14:39, Martin Feuersänger wrote: > Hi List, > > I use WML since some time now to twiddle on my private site from time > to time and I really like it, especially it's flexibility. > > However, since I use WML it's representation to the (internet) world > is very very poor. > > I don't complain about this mailinglist. Even though traffic is very > low, the quality of the occasional messages is good, you can see that > there are people who are really using WML, even at work. Denis Barbier > seems to be still working on the code base, even though there hasn't > been a release for a long time. Also responses are quick. > > But when you are on the mailing list you are allready "into it". But > what do people do who hear the first time about WML? > > 1) They google. > - Asking google about WML doesn't help very much. There is the > unfortunate collision with Wireless Markup Language. But otherwise you > shouldn't expect much from a three letter word search. > - Asking google about "Website Meta Language" is good. You get 12.800 > references and on top is thewml.org > > 2) They go to the top site. > - And this is where trouble starts. Sometimes (like right now) the > site > is unreachable. And if you can reach it, a lot of important features > are broken. A couple of months ago Shlomi Fish announced a brushup of > the site but except for a 'Against epatents' button there is not a > lot of new stuff. > > Don't get me wrong here. I'm not blaming anybody. I just want to state > that for what WML can do, it is totaly 'underadvertised'. > > Here is a list of my top three whishes for the website: > > - a searchable archive of the mailinglist > - online documentation. wmd is fine for me, but if you are just a > potential user, you want to have a look at the documentation before > installing the software - examples, examples, examples. One thing is a > good documentation, but it's nothing without examples. Code for whole > sites is fine but what I would like most is a collection of code > snippets that solve specific problems. What I'm thinking about is a > kind of 'plugin collection'. I'd really like to share some of my > stuff, maybe it's helpfull for others and I'd really like to dig thru > other solutions. > > Ok, these are my thoughts, what do you think? > > Martin > > _____________________________________________________________________ > Website META Language (WML) http://thewml.org > User Support Mailing List [email protected] > Automated List Manager [email protected] _____________________________________________________________________ Website META Language (WML) http://thewml.org User Support Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]