RE: XSLT extension action - continued

Hi,


* What do you think of the name 'transform' for the action?
* Isn't 'ref' a better name for the 'output' attribute (to be conform with the rest of XForms)?
* (not sure if this one) What do you think of 'origin' instead of input (to be consistent with insert action).
* Personally I like the parameters attribute (we could also use this approach if we decide to also add a transform() function), but wouldn't it be more form author friendly to support (also) param child elements which have 'name', 'ref'  and 'value' attributes?

Some questions:
* Are you supporting the 'context' attribute on this action?
*What is the use of the processor attribute?

Regards,

Nick Van den Bleeken
R&D Manager

Phone: +32 3 821 01 70
Office Fax: +32 3 821 01 71
[email protected]
http://www.inventivedesigners.com
Linked in

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of claud108
> Sent: woensdag 25 augustus 2010 21:21
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: XSLT extension action - continued
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I thought about the following syntax:
>
> <xf:process
>       type="xslt | xquery | xproc"
>       processor="exist-client"
>       input="instance('i2')/pac"
>       transformer="doc('test.xsl')"
>       output="instance('i0')/v1"
>       parameters="instance('i2')/parameters"/>
> * instead of @transformer should be @processAgent, @processing-agent, or
> @agent.
>
>
>
>
>
> -----
> Claudius Teodorescu
> http://kuberam.ro
> --
> View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/XSLT-extension-action-
> --continued-tp29495671p29535713.html
> Sent from the w3.org - www-forms mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> --
>


Inventive Designers' Email Disclaimer:
http://www.inventivedesigners.com/email-disclaimer

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
--