Re: base64 encoding for HTTP Basic Authentication - a gap in the XForms function library? (RFE)
"C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <[email protected]> Mon, 13 Sep 2010 14:08:51 -0600
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.xforms |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 12 Sep 2010, at 20:08 , Erik Bruchez wrote: > I would agree with both: > > * Higher-level support is in general desirable to make the form > author's life easier. As a would-be form author, I can only say hear, hear! I would very much like my life to be made easier! But I hope the long-term goal of making the form author's life easier doesn't get in the way of providing the tools necessary to allow a certain amount of self-help in the meantime. I'd rather solve my problem by using xf:header elements than by writing new Java code for my task, if I possibly can! Michael Sperberg-McQueen -- **************************************************************** * C. M. Sperberg-McQueen, Black Mesa Technologies LLC * http://www.blackmesatech.com * http://cmsmcq.com/mib * http://balisage.net ****************************************************************