Re: Re: Changes to ZPublisher
Sidnei da Silva <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.coders |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 05:51:05PM +0200, Andreas Jung wrote: | >>I'm all for these cleanups, or a variation on them, but I'm strongly -1 | >>on them being included in the 2.7 branch. 2.7 is getting very stable | >>now, and I don't want any kind of incompatibility problems added. | > | >Agreed. -1 for mucking with 2.7, even though I realize that it means 500 | >response codes will continue to propagate from Five running on 2.7.3+ | > | | The changes are fine for 2.8, but not for 2.7 since there is a risk that | applications | might break and we really don't want introduce new behaviour in the current | state. It's not like something will break. I highly doubt that something is depending on ZPublisher returning a 500 status code for not found pages. -- Sidnei da Silva <[email protected]> http://awkly.org - dreamcatching :: making your dreams come true http://www.enfoldsystems.com http://plone.org/about/team#dreamcatcher 1: No code table for op: ++post