Re: Question about procedures
Andreas Jung <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.coders |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <9C49DB21A7CE0751B20295AD@[192.168.0.35]> |
--On Donnerstag, 24. März 2005 17:27 Uhr +0100 martin f krafft <[email protected]> wrote: > also sprach Lennart Regebro <[email protected]> [2005.03.24.1709 +0100]: >> Both. Discuss them (zope-dev is the standard place) and make a branch. > > I agree with this approach, but isn't it complete overkill for such > small fixes? > For changes which are limited to a file or a subtree I do always prefer a patch instead of a branch. It is easier to handle a patch than a branch. If a branch with the patch and the destination branch differ too much it can be very hard to merge both and to figure out the important difference. Therefore a patch often can be applied easier to "newer" code even if the patch has been made against an older code base...but it really depends from case to case. -aj _______________________________________________ Zope-Coders mailing list [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 186 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCQ8/HCJIWIbr9KYwRAgX3AKClxjYikHThMeuBCXm5jOrsiFBv/wCgtD3A Z0ZywZWpkgakD6c95PoRU5U= =0k9i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----