Re: Re: ZConfig in SVN repository
Andreas Jung <[email protected]> Tue, 10 May 2005 19:23:50 +0200
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.coders |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <4BF2E6FD3DE1EAD9B02EB31D@[192.168.0.20]> |
--On Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 12:59 Uhr -0400 Tim Peters <[email protected]> wrote: > [Andreas Jung] >>> do I see right that we have two different ZConfig versions in the SVN? >>> One one the root level >>> and one under Zope/lib/python? Shouldn't we unify the versions by making >>> the most current version the master? > > [yuppie] >> Other copies are here: >> >> http://svn.zope.org/Zope3/trunk/src/ZConfig/ >> http://svn.zope.org/ZODB/trunk/src/ZConfig/ > > Also copies in various branches and tags of the above. > > Note that all the same goes for zdaemon too. > >> Maybe using svn:external would make the dependencies more obvious? > > Yup -- although so far there isn't a tag to point at, for either > zdaemon or ZConfig. A quick diff over the the ZConfig trunk and the version 2.8 shows that the ZConfig version on the trunk is the "maintained" version. But I have no idea about zdaemon. >From my point of view it would make sense to replace the copies in the 2.8 tree with external references for the next beta...any objections? Andreas _______________________________________________ Zope-Coders mailing list [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 186 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFCgO4nCJIWIbr9KYwRAiTiAJ4+zP6qp+1zJE+/UlrI7Vcmg23mmQCfQmUr PjejxgY+hHaeYaskeCBIwPc= =Dnzs -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----