Re: Re: ZConfig in SVN repository

--On Dienstag, 10. Mai 2005 14:11 Uhr -0400 Tim Peters 
<[email protected]> wrote:

>> From my point of view it would make sense to replace the copies in the
>> 2.8 tree with external references for the next beta...any objections?
>
> People who think they understand those projects first need to make
> tags, so Zope 2.8 has something to point _to_.  Also, Zope, Zope3, and
> ZODB should all coordinate to make sure they're using the same tags
> for zdaemon and ZConfig.  Else, e.g., I develop ZODB using a ZConfig
> that doesn't match the one Zope uses, and then things break when Zope
> moves to a newer ZODB.

So am I right that you develop the ZODB already against two different 
ZConfig versions
(for Zope 2.8 and Zope 3)? So an unique ZConfig repository does make sense 
to you
 - of course only it is used by everyone. For me it would make perfect 
sense to get
rid of the local copies since it removes the need to maintain multiple 
copies.
@Jim: what's your opinion on this subject?

Andreas

_______________________________________________
Zope-Coders mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-coders

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFCg0SGCJIWIbr9KYwRAomiAKCawTwdard2t3pRzIIMO1axPawcfwCfSF9E
GUBc+KnfJEjgCqbezB7q7Oo=
=dvbA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----