Re: Plone & Lucene

Hi Christian,

Christian Klinger wrote:
> i´ve thougt a little more on Plone and Lucene. You know i worked on a
> PloneLuceneCatalog implementation
> similar to yours CPSLuceneCatalog.

Sure. Please stay on the list it might be interesting for others.

> Is there a reason why you don´t use Catalog Indexes for your
> implementation. What are the advantages of
> releasing the CPSLuceneCatalog as a tool in CPS instead of CatalogIndexes?

yes. As I said, One of the goal is to enhance the global Zope
performance. This way Zope doesn't work at all for indexing searching
which is better.

> The reason why i ask there are many differences in PloneCatalogTool
> between 2.5 and 2.1. I think
> if we work with Indexes the migration to an other version of Plone is no
> problem.

It should be only a matter of indexes / columns configuration. Does
Plone finally supports GenericSetup now ? Because, like this it should
be basically only a matter of lucenecatalog.xml configuration within
your PloneLuceneCatalog profile for Plone.

Do you have a working component using NXLucene on Plone now ?

	J.


-- 
Julien Anguenot | Nuxeo R&D (Paris, France)
Open Source ECM - www.nuxeo.com
CPS Platform - http://www.cps-project.org
Mobile: +33 (0) 6 72 57 57 66

_______________________________________________
cps-devel mailing list
http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFE6vEuGhoG8MxZ/pIRAsGnAJ98rDzPXUyNgWR9HBcmMtIPi38UTACeMY8g
mKqf+L4XaJ/BW6F9FaoDfRc=
=HcXt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----