Re: Plone & Lucene

Christian Klinger <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.cps.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Julien Anguenot schrieb:
> Hi Christian,
> 
> Christian Klinger wrote:
>> i´ve thougt a little more on Plone and Lucene. You know i worked on a
>> PloneLuceneCatalog implementation
>> similar to yours CPSLuceneCatalog.
> 
> Sure. Please stay on the list it might be interesting for others.
> 
>> Is there a reason why you don´t use Catalog Indexes for your
>> implementation. What are the advantages of
>> releasing the CPSLuceneCatalog as a tool in CPS instead of CatalogIndexes?
> 
> yes. As I said, One of the goal is to enhance the global Zope
> performance. This way Zope doesn't work at all for indexing searching
> which is better.
> 
>> The reason why i ask there are many differences in PloneCatalogTool
>> between 2.5 and 2.1. I think
>> if we work with Indexes the migration to an other version of Plone is no
>> problem.
> 
> It should be only a matter of indexes / columns configuration. Does
> Plone finally supports GenericSetup now ? Because, like this it should
> be basically only a matter of lucenecatalog.xml configuration within
> your PloneLuceneCatalog profile for Plone.
> 

Yes GenericSetup is supported unitl version 2.5.

> Do you have a working component using NXLucene on Plone now ?
> 
> 	J.

Hello

the implementation of the PloneLuceneCatalog is generally working.
Espacially indexing works great.

But i have problems with Navigation and Review Portlet. They are very 
complex in Plone. And i´ve not so much time these days.

Maybe i write a plip to get more power in development on the plone-site.


Christian

_______________________________________________
cps-devel mailing list
http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.