Re: nxlucene persistent transport

Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
> Julien Anguenot wrote:
[...]
> OK, the thing is that some of the connections take a lot of time. It's
> either 0.3s or > 5 seconds. So I wonder if I'm not going to rewrite it
> using a non-persistent connection. Have you experienced problems when
> opening a completely new connection each time?

This is really a lot slower if you don't use it. You can try out by
changing the instantiation of the xml-rpc connection stub to not use the
persistent transport. Try out a reindexAll with a little bit of content
and you'll figure out.

Cheers,

	J.

-- 
Julien Anguenot | Nuxeo R&D (Paris, France)
Open Source ECM - http://www.nuxeo.com
Nuxeo 5 : http://www.nuxeo.org
Mobile: +33 (0) 6 72 57 57 66

_______________________________________________
cps-devel mailing list
http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGMjXXGhoG8MxZ/pIRAgKuAKCEZ0ZpZkO+q31hTYpURLQec3LkCQCcDL3s
9ZLvBK0dyVjPD2inDHbBS1s=
=HaeQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----