Re: nxlucene persistent transport

Julien Anguenot wrote:
> Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
>   
>> Julien Anguenot wrote:
>>     
>>> Jean-Marc Orliaguet wrote:
>>>       
>
> [...]
>
>   
>>> Has your PyLucene 2.x branch finally been merged on trunk for NXLucene ?
>>>       
>
> [...]
>
>   
>> not yet been merged as I see, by the way the thread patch can be
>> removed. pylucene2 has it already (I'm going to check in the change).
>>     
>
> for the patch, I backported it from the 2.x branch at that time when
> they introduced it. So yes useless right now.
>
> 	J.
>
>   

OK, I've just removed it. BTW there is one test that fails, it says:

class LuceneServerTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
    def test_reindexing(self):
    ....
        # Reindexing just one field cleares unstored fields. This is a known
        # problem with Lucene, for which we have no solution at the moment.
        # So the following test which demonstrates this) is currently
        # commented out.
        ## Search o2 on fulltext (no return fields)
        res = self._server.searchQuery(return_fields=(),
                                       search_fields=({'id' : u'fulltext',
                                                       'value': 
u'object2'},))

        res = PythonResultSet(ResultSet(res)).getResults()[0]
        self.assertEqual(res, ({u'uid': u'2'},),)

should it be commented out as it says in the comment?

/JM




_______________________________________________
cps-devel mailing list
http://lists.nuxeo.com/mailman/listinfo/cps-devel