Re: Help request from a non-developer
Andreas Jung <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.database |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1785F3F339E42C75DF8B495E@[192.168.0.28]> |
--On 14. April 2006 18:19:38 +0200 Christophe Appell <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/14/06, Andreas Jung <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Can you give me an idea of the level of effort to accomplish this >> > partial data abstraction ? >> This depends really on your individual use case. Sometimes you have an >> exisiting RDBMS and want to store additional content in the ZODB and >> sometimes it is vice versa. > > In this case _everything_ is currently in the ZoDB and I want to be > able to protect some of the data. "protect"? > I am in no way attempting to impose > a database choice, there is no reason in particular in this case that > pushes us to use an RDBMS. In fact another hypothesis I had thought > about was setting up a ZEO server to abstract the data, perhaps this > is a better route ? "abstract"? Please define both. -aj -- ZOPYX Ltd. & Co. KG - Charlottenstr. 37/1 - 72070 Tübingen - Germany Web: www.zopyx.com - Email: [email protected] - Phone +49 - 7071 - 793376 E-Publishing, Python, Zope & Plone development, Consulting _______________________________________________ Zope-DB mailing list [email protected] http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-db
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 186 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (Darwin) iD8DBQFEP85UCJIWIbr9KYwRAnTsAJ9iMHP5wD/MShzUGhDm9CuKY0XJUQCdEAvi FLf3AaH8zneSLapjcqaxzbk= =zNcV -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----