Re: improving the utility and adapter lookup APIs
Gary Poster <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:34 AM, Thomas Lotze wrote: > Gary Poster wrote: > >> >> On Nov 25, 2009, at 11:17 AM, Thomas Lotze wrote: >> >>> What about a simple and consistent API for all components including >>> utilities, adapters and multiadapters: >>> >>> IFoo() >>> IFoo(x) >>> IFoo(x, y) >>> >>> I seem to remember there had been some discussion at some point about >>> dropping or at least loosening the distinction between utilities and >>> adapters anyway, so this would be the opportunity to do so at the API >>> level. >> >> That was discussed and rejected near the very beginning of the Z3 >> effort, in my memory. > > OK. If that was a hard and fast decision, I'll not argue further. FWIW, I'm saying that utilities and adapters are different. I share your/Martijn's/other people's general thoughts about merging adapters and multiadapters in the interface __call__ syntax. Gary _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )