Re: improving the utility and adapter lookup APIs
Christian Theune <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 11/25/2009 08:51 PM, Fabio Tranchitella wrote: > * 2009-11-25 19:35, Tres Seaver wrote: >>>> IFoo() >>>> IFoo(x) >>>> IFoo(x, y) >> >> You can't use an arbitrary number of positional arguments for the >> contexts, because we need to support the named / default cases too. > > I'm probably saying something very stupid... What's wrong with the it? > Can't we define something like: > > def __call__(self, *args, **kw): > .... > > to get a multi adapter in this way? > > IFoo(x, y, default=None, name='something') That's what I thought of as well. The __call__ signature isn't as expressive as before with that but I'm relatively sure it's a valid implementation of Thomas' suggestions. Tres? -- Christian Theune · [email protected] gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )