Re: implementing zope.component 4.0
Thomas Lotze <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Martijn Faassen wrote: > Are people okay with the proposed semantics? I am. > Would people be okay with such an upgrade path? Any better ideas? I'm not comfortable with the idea of an automatic fall-back for IFoo(x, y) but maybe that changes after thinking about it some more. > Most importantly, any volunteers? I'd like to work on this. -- Thomas _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )