Re: implementing zope.component 4.0
Chris McDonough <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Martijn Faassen wrote: > Hi there, > > Introduction > ------------ > > So now that we've had some discussion and to exit the "bikeshed" phase, > let's see about getting some volunteers to work on this. > > The goal here is to make interfaces disappear into the language as much > as possible. I suggest we think to ourselves who the primary beneficiary of this goal is. I don't really disagree with anything you say here in absolute terms, but if the goal is increased adoption by new users, I think there are (relatively) more fundamental things that could be done to help. In particular, I'd suggest we write real documentation for the current zope.component package. When I say "real documentation", I mean something like this: http://docs.repoze.org/component/. "Official" docs for the package itself. Once you start writing documentation, obvious refactoring opportunities often fall out that are more important than adding another layer of abstraction. I think adding more abstraction without documenting the current system will not serve a goal of increasing adoption. - C _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )