Re: A summary of "Interfaces vs ZCA concepts"
Thomas Lotze <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Chris McDonough wrote: > I'll throw out the obvious... > > Why not subclass Interface in zope.component and make the required API > additions there? If it were anybody but us thinking about doing this, > they'd probably just subclass. Because then, if you use third-party code that uses zope.interface.Interface and other code (third-party or your own) that uses the subclassed interfaces, you'll have to deal with both types at the same time in your client code. You could use the new API on some interfaces but not on others, possibly on the same line of code. How readable or maintainable would such code be? -- Thomas _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )