Re: shrinking the ZTK: a proposed solution

Hermann Himmelbauer <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Am Montag 04 Januar 2010 23:10:05 schrieb Tres Seaver:
> Martijn Faassen wrote:
> > Obviously I cannot *force* ZTK
> > maintainers to worry about this. Instead I'm appealing to your
> > self-interest. And of course the transition burden is shared and should
> > not fall solely or even predominantly on the ZTK maintainers.
>
> My self-interest?  Not really:  you are appealing to my altruism, in the
> fact that I care about the *broader* Zope community (broader than Zope2,
> Grok, Plone, or whatever.  Neither of my chosen platforms (Zope2, bfg)
> rely any longer on any of thsoe pacakages at all, which makes my direct
> interest in them exactly zero.

If the ZTK is decoupled from other users, e.g. from people who rely on 
zope.app, then they will simply not use it, or do a fork.

This way, ZTK users are lost, which also leads to a loss of supporters and 
developers and results in a shrinking interest in ZTK, whose primary goal 
was/is to be _the_ base for all other Zope-based applications.

So I think, being altruistic may be quite the same as acting out of 
self-interest.

Best Regards,
Hermann

-- 
[email protected]
GPG key ID: 299893C7 (on keyservers)
FP: 0124 2584 8809 EF2A DBF9  4902 64B4 D16B 2998 93C7
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.