Re: No license distributed with sources
Jens Vagelpohl <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2/10/10 15:53 , Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 08:19, Marius Gedminas <[email protected]> wrote: >> Well, technically I suppose we're all violating the law by not following >> the ZPL requirement of keeping the licence text next to the files it >> covers when we redistribute them. It's unlikely for the Zope Foundation >> to sue any of us, thankfully. > > Oh, you just wait, if I get elected to the board there is gonna be HELLFIRE! > > No, seriously, sticking a copy in each package as a part of the big > header update seems a good idea. +1 on that. Even if adding the file is inappropriate (e.g. because a license file already exists) the checkin will alert the respective package developers to the change and they can fix that if needed. jens -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin) iEYEARECAAYFAkty1asACgkQRAx5nvEhZLLmkQCglk/A9Y2R2f+iF545K+ZgcNZt Wr8An2TycG6VII2yIYguAw3g5WSaLeHe =6Gm/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )