Re: Optional C extensions
Jim Fulton <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Baiju M <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > Any idea how difficult it is to create optional C extensions > for these packages: > > zope.container > zope.hookable > zope.proxy > zope.security I believe it is very hard, if not impossible, for zope.proxy and zope.security. I suspect the best approach would be to make a new package (or set of packages) that provides everything that zope.security providex except the zope.security.proxy package. If I were going to do that though, I would rethink the way proxies and checkers are managed. Jim -- Jim Fulton _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )