zc.buildout "not upgrading" issue (was Re: RFC: 3.4.1 KGS?)

Marius Gedminas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.devel
Message-ID <20100402130253.GC6127@platonas>
A: Because it makes the logic of the discussion difficult to follow.
Q: Why shouldn't I top post?
A: No.
Q: Should I top post?

On Fri, Apr 02, 2010 at 12:29:48PM +0200, Adam GROSZER wrote:
> Hello Wichert,
> 
> Because of our toolchain to release and deploy apps: mypypi and
> keas.build. In fact, because of keas.build depends on zc.buildout.
> 
> Friday, April 2, 2010, 10:53:26 AM, you wrote:
> 
> WA> On 4/2/10 10:36 , Adam GROSZER wrote:
> >> zc.buildout is a tough decision, because it's "not upgrading" issue.
> >> See http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2010-March/015794.html
> 
> WA> Why would you ever install zc.buildout systemwide? Just as with 
> WA> setuptools I consider that to be a recipe for problems.

Why not do

  python2.x bootstrap.py

and then use

  bin/buildout

instead of the globally-installed buildout?

Marius Gedminas
-- 
http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3 consulting and development

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 197 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAku16v0ACgkQkVdEXeem14/8ZACfSK+ytivjxHUSGL3JCiW0CW/Q
esUAn0GO0McLQm6ERLJiP8sY7U6Dxp4w
=JFrT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.