Re: Stacking zope.component registries
Martin Aspeli <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Stephan Richter wrote: > On Thursday 08 April 2010, Marius Gedminas wrote: >> Someone (I'm bad with names, sorry!) recently proposed a change to >> zope.configuration that makes ZCML directives use getSiteManager() >> instead of getGlobalSiteManager(); with that patch in, Chris's example >> should make ZCML configuration register all the components into your >> stacked registry. Although you'd have the other problem of setSite() >> having no effect on the site manager, which would break all local >> utilities and adapters in your tests. > > What about using z3c.baseregistry? You can wrap the baseregistry call around > your ZCML. This way you can create on registry per layer and then use the > __bases__ attribute to stack them together. Yes, I did look at it. However, the real goal is to provide isolation for "anything" that makes ZCA registrations. In particular, that includes provideAdapter() and friends. I suspect z3c.baseregistry can't deal with this? Martin -- Author of `Professional Plone Development`, a book for developers who want to work with Plone. See http://martinaspeli.net/plone-book _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )