Re: "Comply with repository policy" ?
Uli Fouquet <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <1270938976.7414.19.camel@pu> |
Hi there, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > I've seen lots of checkins recently stating "Comply with repository policy". > > I haven't seen any announcement of a new official repository policy. > Have I missed it? Tres explained that very well, I think. I also did some comply-with-repos-policy checkins based on zope.repositorypolicy complaints and stumbled about one point: z.repositorypolicy requires to set the `author` field in setup.py to read ``Zope Foundation and Contributors``. While this is possibly a valid value for that field, I wonder why you cannot also set individual authors or groups of them. The problem: - Is the Zope Foundation really the author of the works checked in (in the juridical sense) or shouldn't we make a difference between an author (like "Mark Twain") and a copyright holder (like the "Mark Twain Foundation") stated in COPYRIGHT.txt? - Sometimes it is simply handy to know whom to ask directly when some problem occurs with a package. Yes, one can lookup the SVN history, but it's often much quicker to simply look in setup.py or on PyPI. Just curious, -- Uli _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 189 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBLwP1gXZ59JM1tazsRAs/uAJ4nqLidvqdw2XmAD0VUSiHhZSV1bgCguZva pMzWFNF2Zcv/AGPjXfUaUiA= =4FBn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----