Re: RFC: Proposed new style for documenting and testing ZTK packages
Lennart Regebro <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 16:05, Laurence Rowe <[email protected]> wrote: > It's important that documentation is tested as part of the standard > test run, that means when you change something you know to update the > docs. repoze.bfg seemed to make an attempt at this, though it is > currently disabled. > http://svn.repoze.org/repoze.bfg/trunk/repoze/bfg/tests/test_docs.py How could I forget about Manuel. *facepalm*. I've written Manuel extensions to test sphinx tests, but Benji hasn't had time to review it yet: http://svn.zope.org/manuel/branches/sphinx/ So it's perfectly possible to run all types of Sphinx tests even with codeblocks, as a part of the standard testrun. -- Lennart Regebro: http://regebro.wordpress.com/ Python 3 Porting: http://python-incompatibility.googlecode.com/ +33 661 58 14 64 _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )