Re: Version bump question? Bikeshed here.
Hanno Schlichting <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Fred Drake <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Hanno Schlichting <[email protected]> wrote: >> If it is intended to be backwards compatible and seems to be so, I'd >> say go with 1.3. It sounds like a new package dependency, like we have >> had many others in minor releases. > > Since when were new dependencies not considered features? They are of course. In my vocabulary a version consists of major. minor . micro (or patchlevel). Going from 1.2 to 2.0 is a major new feature release. Going from 1.2 to 1.3 is a minor new feature release. Package dependencies are a new feature and need a new feature release. They cannot be done in "third-dot" or "bug fix" releases. But Lennart didn't ask for that. Hanno _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )