Re: Hanno, please update the ZTK

Wichert Akkerman <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.devel
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 5/3/10 13:07 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>> On 5/3/10 12:51 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
>>> Wichert Akkerman wrote:
>>>> Can we please not rehash an old discussion or make this personal? This
>>>> has all been discussed too often already.
>>> As far as I know, I've *never* discussed this fork on this list, but I
>>> might be wrong; feel free to dig the archives. But that doesn't matter:
>>> the fork is still there. So: wtf, Wichert?
>>
>> Perhaps you haven't, but others have discussed the reason the fork was
>> cerated and why it still exists. Since then many things have happened
>> including the creation of the ZTK steering group, of which Hanno is a
>> member.
>
> The ZTK steering group was created about a year ago, so I'm not sure
> what you're trying to suggest here.

Sorry, my mistake. I meant the ZTK release manage group, not the now 
defunct ZTK steering group,

> I must say it totally baffles me that the ZTK was acceptable to Zope 2
> until january, and became unacceptable at that point. All answers are
> probably in that mailing list thread, but I can't be bothered to look it
> up. Please just make the fork go away.

The needed steps to do that can be found in the list archives.

Wichert.
_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.