Re: summary of suggestions
Martijn Faassen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Lennart Regebro wrote: > On Mon, May 3, 2010 at 20:13, Martijn Faassen <[email protected]> wrote: >> Since there are no ZTK releases Grok and BlueBream gain stability by >> pinning to a particular revision of ztk.cfg (and moving it forward when >> needed). Zope 2 could easily do the same. If more is needed, then a >> branch or tag can easily be made. Besides the perennial documentation >> issues, I also don't see why we couldn't just start releasing the ZTK; >> instead of pinning to an SVN revision we'd start pinning to an SVN tag >> (or a release URL with version number in it). What's the holdup, really? > > Making a ZTK 1.0a seems to be a good idea to me, and should help here. > And we don't have to commit to anything, since it's an alpha. I think the list needs to commit to something, because we do have people coming from older versions of Grok, BlueBream (in the form of Zope 3) and Zope 2 (though apparently Zope 2 has the least issues). While the ZTK might be new the underlying codebase isn't new at all. Regards, Martijn _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )