Re: ZTK Package Metadatas
Justin Ryan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> > Just for reference: > > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/2010-June/002860.html > > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/catalog-sig/2010-June/002892.html > Thanks, Chris.. Nice of you to point out that I joined catalog-sig to see what the community was like, for the purpose of possibly promoting a new Framework :: designation for ZTK, and encountered the equivalent of walking into a bar fight and being stabbed with a glass bottle after suggesting that perhaps I could help all parties reach their goals. While you and Guido took offense to my post, far more silent participants of the list expressed agreeance. And I want nothing more than to get far, far away from conversations like this. So, as I'm offering to bring consistency to the setup.py files of IIRC ~67 packages, perhaps you'd be interested in proposing to catalog-sig that there be a Framework :: Zope Toolkit, or Framework :: ZTK. I suspect we should discuss on this list what that may be. Peace, Love, and Components, Justin Alan Ryan [ bitmonk ] _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )