Re: Can ZTK 1.0 support Python 2.7?

Marius Gedminas <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.comp.web.zope.devel
Message-ID <20100713193612.GA28405@platonas>
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 10:01:35AM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Charlie Clark
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> what's the time frame for ZTK 1.0?
> > 
> > I put that info into the "post scriptum" of my mail.
> > 
> >> Have I missed a mail with more failures? I would have thought getting
> >> those tests to pass for a release is a reasonable aim.
> > 
> > You have. It's only "bin/test-ztk" that passes. bin/test-zopeapp still
> > has a number of failures.
> 
> There is also the zope.testing failure where a doctest tries to drive
> the pdb module:  2.7 added a new intermediate (private) method to the
> call stack in unittest's 'assertEqual', which causes that test to fail.

That shouldn't be too difficult to fix; zope.testing already uses quite
a few regexp-based renormalizers to hide traceback elements that differ
in different Python versions.

(Debugging those is a pain, though.)

Marius Gedminas
-- 
http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3 consulting and development

_______________________________________________
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [email protected]
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkw8wCkACgkQkVdEXeem14+bkgCePRsJEdDpRQiNGQvIn233L+xs
7msAn1NMG23XMFH2vQIljiXvmK7/qe9p
=56q9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.