Re: Zope Tests: 47 OK, 17 Failed
Christian Theune <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07/12/2010 03:29 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > >> Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.7.0 Linux 32bit >> From: ccomb at free.fr >> Date: Mon Jul 12 00:18:15 EDT 2010 >> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-July/016518.html > ... >> Subject: FAILED : ZTK 1.0 / Python2.7.0 Linux 32bit >> From: ccomb at free.fr >> Date: Mon Jul 12 01:53:35 EDT 2010 >> URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2010-July/016524.html > > Maybe we should not be running the ZTK 1.0 tests against Python 2.7: > the failures in the pinned zope.testing.testrunner, for instance, seem > to be WONTFIX on the new platform. I think it is fine to run "trunk" > version tests against Python 2.7 (e.g., once we add zope.testrunner and > unpin zope.testing). > > Or maybe we can just cut the frequency of those runs down. Having too > many failures show up every day is seriously demotivating. Ack. -- Christian Theune · [email protected] gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )