Re: unit test policy questions
Christian Theune <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 07/29/2010 02:17 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 7/29/10 14:00 , Martin Aspeli wrote: >> On 29 July 2010 19:26, yuppie<[email protected]> wrote: >>> 1.) Is it still policy to add these lines? >>> >>> 2.) Is there a better solution for using zope testrunner than the one >>> shown above? >> >> I never do either. I install zc.recipe.testrunner in a buildout and >> use bin/test, which picks up tests in modules automatically. > > Same here. I have never in my life run tests by executing the module. > The options provided by the testrunner to pare down what I want to test > have always been sufficient for me. > > I have had a tendency to add these blurbs myself, thinking "I guess it's > useful for *someone*". But IMHO it's like those CVS/SVN $Id$ snippets, > it's not really useful anymore. Fullack. Even better: the current test runner even lets you avoid the test_suite function in many cases. -- Christian Theune · [email protected] gocept gmbh & co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1 Zope and Plone consulting and development _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )