Re: Extending Zope2 bin/instance run
David Glick <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sep 3, 2010, at 12:50 AM, "Wichert Akkerman" <[email protected]> wrote: > I have noticed that now that we are almost exclusively using eggs to > distribute our software using "bin/instance run" has become difficult: > often the script you want to run is located inside an egg which makes to > path to it hard to predict. This is not the most user friendly command: > > bin/instance run eggs/my.package-*/my/package/script.py > > If a user is using a shared egg directory from zc.buildout or something > else the egg can be anywhere on the filesystem, making it next to > impossible to explain to users. > > I am considering to modify bin/instance run to check if its first > argument is a filesystem path, and if not consider the argument to be a > dotted name of a callable which should be invoke. That way backwards > compatibility remains, but you can now also do this: > > bin/instance run my.package.script.main > > I am not sure if this is best done in plone.recipe.zope2instance or > Zope2.Startup.zopectl. They have differing versions of ZopeCmd. Perhaps > the plone.recipe.zope2instance code should be merged into Zope2's > original as well? At some point I made it possible to add additional bin/instance commands via a plone.recipe.zope2instance entry point. ---------- David Glick Web Developer [email protected] 206.286.1235x32 Groundwire: You Are Connected http://groundwire.org _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )