Re: SVN: five.pt/trunk/src/five/pt/ The container should be the Acquisition.aq_parent.
Hanno Schlichting <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel,gmane.comp.web.zope.cmf |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Tres Seaver <[email protected]> wrote: > 'container' is supposed to be the folder which holds the script / > template, not the context. In a CMF site, that will typically be the > site root, given the way items in skin layers appear to be direct > attributes of the portal object. For purposes of Five views, the "view > object" seemss like the right object to be the 'container' for the > template: if that is the case here (hard to see from just the diff), great. Note this comment from Products.Five.browser.pagetemplatefile in the pt_getContext method (made during the AQ vs. parent pointer work): namespace.update( here=obj, # philiKON thinks container should be the view, # but BBB is more important than aesthetics. container=obj, ... So in view page templates container and context have historically always been the same. So far we said BBB trumps anything else here. Hanno _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )