Re: zope.interface memory optimization
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20101108232100.GA19343@platonas> |
On Mon, Nov 08, 2010 at 03:35:09PM +0100, Brian Sutherland wrote: > I've committed 2 patches to a "jinty-mem" branch of zope.interface. > Together these patches reduce the startup memory use of my ZTK based > application by 3%. Is that enough to justify their risk/complexity? > > https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/checkins/2010-November/052516.html > https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/checkins/2010-November/052517.html > > If no-one replies, I'll assume that 3% is just not enough to be > interesting and do nothing;) It's so interesting I'm going to ask for even more numbers: how much is that 3% in kilobytes, or objects? Is there any measurable speed impact for application startup or test runs (faster/slower)? Otherwise I'm +1, assuming this doesn't somehow make the code 10% slower. Marius Gedminas -- http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkzYhdwACgkQkVdEXeem148+RwCfao3Q03d/dXPBFVl37SHSVtl+ 6coAnRnUuGgFpo0hkmA+o/+kX1xIyKAc =9zsa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----