Re: Context priority as an alternative to configuration directive overrides
Stephan Richter <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Thursday, December 02, 2010, Malthe Borch wrote: > As far as I understand, for a ZCML include override to work properly, > you need to carefully make sure that your includes are in the exact > right order and on the same level. In a system where two packages are > trying to override the same component (should arguably never be the > csae, but it is frequently), it can be difficult to get it right. This explanation helped me to understand where you come from. I think I would be okay with the priority feature, but could we maybe limit it to the <configure> element? Since you can use this element anywhere and it can be nested, it should work well. Regards, Stephan -- Entrepreneur and Software Geek Google me. "Zope Stephan Richter" _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )