Re: Context priority as an alternative to configuration directive overrides
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20101203104807.GA20449@platonas> |
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:15:44AM +0100, Malthe Borch wrote: > I always found configuration overrides (e.g. ZCML's <includeOverrides> > directive) to be difficult to manage and hard to get right. > > How about an alternative where you can put a priority on a > configuration context like so: > > <adapter zcml:priority="100" ... /> -1 Adding more complexity is not a solution for "the configuration mechanism is too complex to get right". Marius Gedminas -- http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkz4yuQACgkQkVdEXeem148ESgCfV0Ld9o034bJ0LS1b/d/rJMMs BQIAn10IGAzjHazzUEAFji5JNg+hEmKf =W0Bp -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----