Re: Context priority as an alternative to configuration directive overrides
Marius Gedminas <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20101204222828.GB5692@platonas> |
On Sat, Dec 04, 2010 at 12:21:02PM -0800, Ross Patterson wrote: > Malthe Borch <[email protected]> writes: > > I always found configuration overrides (e.g. ZCML's <includeOverrides> > > directive) to be difficult to manage and hard to get right. > > I'd like to echo Malthe's concern here. I've had many issues with this > as well. > > Recently I had a conversation with someone or read something about using > add-on specific stacked component registries. Would this be the best > way to solve these kind of problems? Unfortunately I can't remember > where I head/read of this. Sounds like z3c.baseregistry. Marius Gedminas -- http://pov.lt/ -- Zope 3/BlueBream consulting and development _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
signature.asc
(application/pgp-signature, 198 B)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkz6wIsACgkQkVdEXeem14+CNQCffFOiFcz6AgPxS80CtWrvYJFR ynEAnA83l/ktpy+cYN0hA7nxyePbgIwt =tUK7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----