Re: Work on the zope.publisher components and their genericity
Souheil CHELFOUH <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.comp.web.zope.devel |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Thank you for taking the time to answer, Jim. The work, according to its descriptive nature, was done on the trunk. I can revert the change and make a branch, if that's more appropriate for this kind of evolution. No problem. - Souheil 2011/3/24 Jim Fulton <[email protected]>: > On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 12:17 PM, Souheil CHELFOUH <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I've been working a lot on zope.publisher lately, trying to extract >> its essence to make my own publisher and flatten the publication >> process. >> This led me to the prototyping of some essential components I wanted >> to factor out of zope.publisher. >> Mainly, these are definitions, aka interfaces, therefore I created >> some new entries in zope.browser. >> >> Here are the changelogs : >> >> Added definitions to the base browser publishing process, including : >> >> * IRequest and IResponse >> * IPublisher >> * Errors definitions with : IPublishingError, IBadRequest, INotFound >> and IRedirect >> * Views publishing help : IDefaultViewName, that permits to retrieve >> the name of the default view for a context. >> >> This allows us to move toward a greater interoperability with other >> systems, severing a lot of zope packages' ties with ``zope.publisher``, >> where all these concepts were initially defined. ``zope.publisher`` will >> now use these interfaces as mixins to create zope publication >> specific definitions. Components that don't need the full blow >> definition can now register on broader interfaces, making them >> available to non ``zope.publisher`` aware applications. >> >> >> I would like very much to see that review and criticized constructively. > > Is there a branch to review? > >> zope.browser hosts some irrelevant definitions and i added things I >> thought would make sense. >> The next step would be to lighten the dependencies of some zope >> component on zope.publisher. >> If possible, i'd like to see this 1.4 released. >> >> Thank you for your attention > > Thanks for digging into this. I'd be happy to do a review and give some > feedback. > > Jim > > > -- > Jim Fulton > http://www.linkedin.com/in/jimfulton > _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - [email protected] https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )